Pain: a neglected symptom in hemophilia.

Repetitive bleeding attacks may cause joint pain and arthropathy in patients with hemophilia (PWH). Despite being a common symptom, pain is not a well-studied topic in this disease. The aim of this cross-sectional, observational study was to assess the frequency and intensity of pain and analyze the success rates ofpain treatment methods. Adult hemophilia patients were included in the study. The Multidimensional Hemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ) was used to assess pain. In addition to the MHPQ, demographic data were collected. Fifty adult hemophilia patients were included in the study. Thirty-one (62%) of the patients reported pain due to hemophilia in the last year. Twenty-six of them (81.2%) reported pain during bleeding attacks. The most successful pain coping strategy was clotting factor replacement. None of the participants used opioids or adjuvant analgesics. None of them used a physical therapy modality or interventional pain therapy method. While 67.6% of the patients were very dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their global pain treatment, only 16.1% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Patients with higher pain during bleeding episodes were more likely to continue their prophylaxis. There was no significant difference between plasma-derived or recombinant-derived factor prophylaxis in terms of pain complaints. Pain is a frequent and important symptom of hemophilia, but most of the patients are not treated sufficiently. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve the life quality of the patients. In addition to successful bleeding prophylaxis, administration of a proper and adequate analgesic regimen and combined physical therapy modalities may decrease pain intensity and prevent the development of arthropathy.

Clinical Evaluation of Patients with COVID-19 Within the Framework of Comorbidities.

Objectives: Chronic systemic diseases (CSD) and cancer are closely related to the clinical course, severity and mortality of COVID-19 due to the immunosuppressive conditions caused by these diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the effects of cancer and CSD on the clinical and laboratory parameters of patients with COVID-19. Methods: The study included patients who received inpatient treatment with the diagnosis of COVID-19 at Ondokuz Mayis University between March 16, 2020, and December 1, 2020. The participants were divided into four groups as follows: Those without comorbidities (Group 1), those with only CSD (Group 2), those with only cancer (Group 3), and those with both CSD and cancer (Group 4). Comparative statistical evaluation was performed in terms of clinical symptoms, biochemical parameters, and admission to intensive care and survival. Results: In total, 750 patients were included: 242 patients in Group 1, 442 in Group 2, 27 in Group 3, and 39 in Group 4. The mean age of the patients was 57.1±9.4 years and 53.7% were male. Patients of Group 1 were significantly different from those of the other groups in terms of age, requirement for intensive care and intubation, complications, survival, white blood cell and lymphocyte count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and levels of hemoglobin, lactic acid dehydrogenase, ferritin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (for each p<0.001). Conclusion: No difference was observed among laboratory parameters, intensive care admission, intubation need, complication frequency, and survival rates in patients with CSD or cancer. It was detected that all three groups with CSD and cancer were worse than Group 1 in terms of intensive care need, intubation, and survival.

Turkey real-life data: demographic features, treatment results and effects of comorbidities in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Aim: This study aimed to identify patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes and to evaluate the effects of presence of comorbidities at diagnosis in chronic phase (CP)-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Turkey. Materials & methods: Hospital records between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Of 861 CP-CML patients included, 31% had at least one comorbidity at diagnosis. Sex, cardiovascular disease status at diagnosis and molecular (at least major) and cytogenetic (partial and complete) responses were the independent predictors of survival. Conclusion: The response rates of CP-CML patients to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors were satisfactory. In addition to tolerability and side effect profiles of drugs, comorbidity status of patients should also be considered in treatment choice in CML patients.

This study aimed to identify patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes and to evaluate the effects of presence of comorbidities at diagnosis in chronic phase (CP)-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Turkey. Hospital records of patients between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the included 861 CP-CML patients, 31% had at least one comorbidity at diagnosis. The survival of the patients was affected by sex, cardiovascular disease status at diagnosis, and molecular (at least major) and cytogenetic (partial and complete) responses. The response rates of CP-CML patients to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors were satisfactory. In addition to tolerability and side effect profiles of drugs, comorbidity status of patients should also be considered in treatment choice in CML patients.

Acute serious thrombocytopenia associated with intracoronary tirofiban use for primary angioplasty.

Tirofiban, a specific glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, may cause extensive thrombocytopenia with an incidence of 0.2% to 0.5%. We report the case of a 50-year-old man who developed thrombocytopenia after tirofiban use (both intracoronary and peripheral) over hours and the successful management of this complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.